Shimron Hetmyer's fireworks give debutants Samp Army top-two finish ahead of playoffs

New York Strikers, themselves first-timers, face Samp Army in Qualifier 1, while Team Abu Dhabi and Deccan Gladiators meet in the Eliminator

Aadam Patel03-Dec-2022The final four of the Abu Dhabi T10 is set after Friday’s triple-header at the Sheikh Zayed Stadium, with New York Strikers and Morrisville Samp Army, the two new franchises, topping the league table. They will now be going head-to-head in Saturday’s Qualifier 1, with the winner directly making it to Sunday’s final.After Delhi Bulls beat Chennai Brave in a dead rubber on the last day of the round-robin matches, Samp Army brushed Northern Warriors aside to temporarily go atop before Strikers reclaimed top spot by hammering Team Abu Dhabi.In what is the same format as the IPL, the loser between Samp Army and Strikers will get another go on Saturday evening against the winner of the Eliminator between Team Abu Dhabi and defending champions Deccan Gladiators.Related

Russell finally comes to the party to put Gladiators in Abu Dhabi T10 final

Azam Khan catches the eye again as Strikers snap Samp Army's streak

Globetrotter Peter Hatzoglou's post-birthday bash in Abu Dhabi

Desire for global title burns bright for Parnell despite WC disappointment

Moeen Ali’s Samp Army side came into their final league match knowing that a win would be enough to finish in the top two, but found themselves in a bit of bother after losing four wickets in the space of eight deliveries during their chase of 118. At 82 for 5 at the start of the seventh over, the game was in the balance, with Moeen, David Miller, Shimron Hetmyer, Karim Janat and Johnson Charles back in the dugout.Both Moeen and Miller were dismissed without troubling the scorers, but a rapid 45 off 18 deliveries from Hetmyer – including five monstrous sixes – had set Samp Army up, after which Dwaine Pretorius (17* off seven) and Chamika Karunaratne (22* off eight) held their nerve to take their side home with nine balls to spare.Hetmyer was in the headlines in October after missing West Indies’ rescheduled flight before the T20 World Cup, and subsequently getting removed from the West Indies squad, but has enjoyed being a part of the T10. He walked into the post-match press conference with a bandage around his left arm after hurting himself during the run chase, but still with a beaming smile.”Whatever’s happened before has happened, and I’m trying to put that behind me,” Hetmyer said. “One of the best things about T10 cricket is just the freedom to go out and express yourself. Win, lose or draw, I try and play the game with a smile on my face, and enjoy it as much as I can.”After seeing Samp Army’s win, Chris Lynn’s Abu Dhabi outfit knew that nothing less than two points would do if they wanted to get back in the top two, and coming off the back of a four-game win streak, they would have certainly fancied their chances. But Strikers have found another gear throughout the last week, and came into the game with a five-match winning run of their own. And from the moment Kieron Pollard won the toss, they were in control.They struck regularly with the ball, with Wahab Riaz taking 3 for 4, and Rashid Khan showcasing his craft and guile by bowling his namesake Adil Rashid and Andrew Tye. At the halfway mark, a total of 78 was never going to trouble Pollard’s side, who had spent their previous two evenings in Abu Dhabi pulling off chases of 144 and 113.Though Paul Stirling was undone by a superb inswinger from Naveen-Ul-Haq, it was Eoin Morgan and Muhammad Waseem who steadied the ship before Adil Rashid removed his former England captain. But any doubt of a Strikers’ win was removed in the next over, as David Payne was sent for three sixes by Waseem, and Pollard secured victory in style with a huge hit over long-on.Eight teams are now down to four, and it is the new boys who are making all the noise at season six of Abu Dhabi T10.

Shivam Dube joins the IPL's six-hitting elite

Among Indians with at least 500 runs in the tournament, only one has hit more sixes than fours and that’s the CSK spin hitter

Deivarayan Muthu29-Apr-2023Shivam Dube is a six-hitter.Since his IPL debut in 2019, he has smashed 57 sixes and 56 fours. Among Indian batters with at least 500 runs in the tournament, nobody else’s sixes tally is greater than his fours tally. Overall, only Kieron Pollard (223 sixes, 218 fours), Andre Russell (183 sixes, 144 fours), Nicholas Pooran (80 sixes, 62 fours), Shimron Hetmyer (67 sixes, 62 fours) and Liam Livingstone (42 sixes, 40 fours) have hit more sixes than fours for this condition in the IPL.One-third of Dube’s sixes have come this season alone, which is just passed its midway stage.Dube has his limitations as a batter: he is vulnerable against express pace and bounce, and similarly struggles against wide lines. But he has the tools to dominate any variety of spin. His big reach and long levers can mess with the length – and mind – of even top T20 spinners. With those gifts, he can convert a length ball into a slot ball. Just ask the likes of R Ashwin, Sunil Narine and Varun Chakravarthy. Royal Challengers Bangalore even had to hide Wanindu Hasaranga, the No.1-ranked T20I spinner, from Dube.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhen Dube was with Royal Challengers in 2019 and 2020, they largely used him as a finisher at Nos. 6 and 7, which exposed him to fast bowlers and death-bowling specialists. In 13 innings for them, Dube managed only 169 runs at an average of 16.90, high score of 27 not out, and strike rate of 122.46. With more opportunities up the order for Super Kings and the freedom to line up spinners, Dube has lifted his average to 30.88 after 18 innings and strike rate to 156.71.After the game against Royal Challengers at the Chinnaswamy Stadium, MS Dhoni revealed that Super Kings originally had some plans in store for Dube ahead of IPL 2023, but he arrived at their camp in Chennai last month with an injury. So, they put them on pause and just tried to maximise Dube’s strengths by deploying him as their spin hitter at No. 3 or 4, and giving him ideal entry points to start against spin. The slower bowlers have been in action from at least one end when Dube has walked out to bat in six of the seven innings he has played this season.Bumping Dube up the order coincided with Ben Stokes’ injury-enforced absence, and in order to accommodate Dube, the Super Kings management has been open to dropping Moeen Ali, another spin hitter, and pushing Ravindra Jadeja down the order. The move has worked well for them, with Dube rattling off three successive half-centuries.”He is someone who can hit very cleanly,” Dhoni said of Dube after he had slammed his first fifty in Bengaluru. “Yes, he has an issue with fast bowlers, but when it comes to the spinners, he’s a very clean hitter and he’s a tall guy. So, he has a different reach compared to some of the other batters. So, the spinners have to adjust their length according to him.”We had certain plans for him, but once he arrived for our camp, he was injured. So, we couldn’t do a lot of work, so we feel he’s somebody who can deliver and get us those extra runs in the middle overs. The thing is he needs to believe in that more than us. We know he has the talent but once you cross the rope and you’re standing over there [in the middle], you’re on your own. So, you need to have that belief in yourself.”ESPNcricinfo LtdIn that game against Royal Challengers, Dube launched an attempted yorker from Harshal Patel into the roof of the stadium for a 111-metre six. His ability to hit such monster sixes has triggered bidding wars at auctions. Amol Muzumdar, an analyst for ESPNcricinfo and Dube’s coach at Mumbai in domestic cricket, feels Dube’s six hitting is “second to none”.”When you look at Shivam Dube, the first thing that strikes you is his ball-striking ability,” Muzumdar says. “His ball-striking is unique and very hard, and his six-hitting ability is second to none. That’s why he becomes a very dangerous T20 player. He’s got long levers and uses those long levers to good effect and hence he gets that distance on the ball. He is aware of it, and he goes about training hitting those big shots in those net sessions.”I’ve seen him hit top-quality spinners in domestic cricket, and here even in the IPL. Of course, the pitches in the IPL and domestic cricket differ, but he’s got the ability to adjust quickly. He’s a thorough professional.”Focusing on fitness and lower-body strength during the domestic season has also contributed to Dube’s success. With Stokes still on the sidelines, Dhoni has also trusted Dube’s catching and fielding at the hotspots in the outfield.”If you look at him, he doesn’t seem that methodical, but he’s very methodical in his approach,” Muzumdar says. “When he comes for practice, he’s very straightforward and he knows what he’s going to do out of that session. Every practice session means a lot to him. He was coming out of an injury into the domestic season and again [got injured]. There was not much cricket played post IPL because of the extended monsoons in Mumbai. So, we had a short trip to Ahmedabad and from there we started our campaign in the Syed Mushtaq Ali [Trophy].”He has worked hard on his fitness and spent a lot of time with the physio and the trainer. He was working a lot on his running and his striding. He just wanted to get more strength in his legs because the hamstring injury was something of a big concern for him.”India had flirted with ‘Project Dube’ before but it didn’t work out. He was once hammered for 34 runs in an over against New Zealand in a T20I in Mount Maunganui in 2020. Which is maybe why this new role fits him better. He doesn’t have to worry about bowling anymore. He can put all his focus on the one thing he does better most people out there. Hit spinners for sixes. With Super Kings set to play four of their last six league fixtures – and potentially the playoffs – at spin-friendly Chepauk, Dube’s influence could be huge.

Ajinkya Rahane, India's quiet hero

With a blend of composure, calmness, skills and courage, he once again helped the side live to fight another day

Nagraj Gollapudi09-Jun-20232:24

The technical changes that have brought Rahane success

After he pulled Pat Cummins for a six to bring up his half-century, Ajinkya Rahane kept his helmet-covered head bowed. The moment lasted barely a few seconds, but it was poignant. In that instance, Rahane probably told himself whatever he had been doing since being dropped from the Indian Test side in January 2022 was worth it.Since then Rahane has been telling himself, and us, to be in the moment. And that nothing else matters. Whether he has featured in 80-plus Tests, led India with distinction whenever the opportunity arose, or played some great knocks over the years. Or that he was grinding it out for Mumbai in the Ranji Trophy, or scoring runs at a breakneck speed for Chennai Super Kings in their recent IPL triumph. None of that matters.Rahane has played his cricket away from the spotlight, but quietly he has managed to do extraordinary things. If not for him, India might not have won the 2020-21 Border-Gavaskar Trophy in Australia. After India were bundled out for 36 in the first Test in Adelaide, he quietly took over the captaincy from Virat Kohli, who returned to India for the birth of his daughter. In the second Test, in Melbourne, Rahane scored one of the best centuries in Test history to help India level the series.Related

  • Ball-by-ball: How Rahane and Thakur rode their luck

  • Postcard from a morning in hell: Boland and Cummins unleash on India

  • Australia still on top but Rahane and Thakur lead India's resistance

  • Cummins finds the going tough after shoddy no-ball display

But when Rishabh Pant hit the winning runs in Brisbane to help India win the series 2-1, and virtually every Indian player charged onto the field to celebrate, Rahane stayed behind the boundary line. The Mumbai school of cricket has ingrained in him to not be loud in celebration, instead let his bat make all the noise.On Thursday, even before he walked in with India reeling at 50 for 3 in response to Australia’s 469 in the World Test Championship final at The Oval, Rahane would have blanked out all the emotions. It didn’t matter to him how he found his way back into the side after nearly an 18-month absence. His shirt number was the same. His batting position was the same. And his role was the same. Moreover, to bat with the team in troubled waters was also familiar territory.”You can be the hero if you stay in the moment,” Ajinkya Rahane seems to be telling himself•ICC/Getty ImagesImmediately upon arrival, Rahane faced an incisive spell from Cummins, including one of the best deliveries of the match. Pitching around fourth stump, on the fuller side of the good-length band, the ball seamed in. Rahane, who was rooted in his crease, was forced to play but the ball straightened just a wee bit to beat his outside edge and rap him on the back thigh. It was in line with off stump, and umpire Richard Illingworth didn’t hesitate in raising his finger. But Cummins had overstepped.The Australia captain pitched the next ball on an almost identical spot. On this occasion, the ball moved in sharply to jab Rahane’s right index finger, which had to be taped.The four earlier in the over was already a distant memory. It had taken him to 17, where Rahane would stay stuck for 23 balls. But he was not worried. After facing the white Kookaburra for two months in the IPL, and adjusting to the varying lengths, uneven bounce and relentless questions from Cummins, Scott Boland, Cameron Green and Mitchell Starc was part of the joy of Test cricket.The striking feature of Rahane’s innings on day two was that he never looked in a rush or ruffled. But on Friday, he did ensure that the scoreboard kept ticking. The boundaries came via the skillfully carved out steers between gully and point, and the punched drives off the front foot through covers.On a testing pitch against a high-quality attack mistakes were bound to happen, but luck was Rahane’s pal more than once. On 72, he played away from his body at a full ball on fifth stump from Cummins; the outside edge, though, was spilled by David Warner, who possibly was distracted by Alex Carey’s movement.It did not bother Rahane. When Nathan Lyon came on to bowl about 20 minutes before lunch, he skipped out of his crease to drive the offspinner through cover-point for four. The pace at which Rahane and Shardul Thakur were scoring started to bother Australia, and the attacking field of the morning changed with fielders pushed deep.No pain, no gain: Rahane gets his finger taped after taking a blow from Cummins•Glyn Kirk/AFP/Getty ImagesA century on comeback was rudely denied by the catch of the Test by Green at gully, but Rahane did not bite his lip. He had done his job admirably: not only did he prove his worth again, that he was still capable of pulling the team out of a spot of bother on difficult pitches, but he also helped Thakur stay at the crease despite the latter being peppered by the seamers.Thakur, who was also making a comeback having played his previous Test last July against England, said that Rahane had told him the one way they could rebuild the innings was by giving feedback to each other on Australia’s bowling plans. Rahane told Thakur to quickly point it out if he committed any mistake.It is this down-to-earth nature of Rahane, his willingness to learn and treat everyone as an equal, is what earns him the respect of his peers and former greats. That is what makes him a hero for youngsters.And that respect is what drives Rahane to do some amazing stuff. On the 2018 tour of South Africa, Rahane had been dropped for the first two Tests of the three-match series, which India lost. Rahane would reveal later that he was “hurt” and “disappointed” but when told by the team management that he would play the final Test in Johannesburg, he told himself it was the “best opportunity to become a hero”. Rahane scored 48, the highest contribution in India’s second innings on a pitch which the ICC would rate poor because of dangerous bounce. He himself likened it to a century as South Arica lost by 63 runs chasing 241.Probably, that’s what Rahane was telling himself after his fifty on Friday morning: “You can be the hero if you stay in the moment.” His innings was a blend of composure, calmness, skills and courage.The challenge for him and the reason for being dropped remain the same – can he score the big runs consistently? But that’s a question for another day. For now, he is the reason India still have some hope of drawing, or even winning, this Test.

Why the current India side is the best Test team of its time

They have won close to two-thirds of their Tests in the most recent cycle, and their fast bowlers and spinners alike have delivered stellar numbers

Kartikeya Date12-Jul-2023India have now lost four knockout matches in ICC tournaments in England in Tests and ODIs, all at two-year intervals, in 2017, 2019, 2021 and 2023. In among these four setbacks, their T20 international side failed to win any World Cups too. It has been a humiliating period for India’s millions of fans, and like most humiliated fans, they’re asking questions.It is now just past ten years that India last won an ICC tournament, when they beat South Africa, West Indies, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and then England in a rain-affected final in the 2013 ICC Champions Trophy. In this period, they have won the ODI and T20I Asia Cups once each, and the Nidahas Trophy in 2018, but no ICC title. Across three formats, in ten years, India have lost eight ICC knockout matches – three ODIs, three T20Is and two Tests. In these ten years, India have played 207 other ODIs, 151 other T20Is, and 96 other Tests, and won them all at a ratio of close to two wins to each loss – a rate that no previous Indian side has approached. By any reasonable measure, this is not only the best Indian side yet, it is one of the greatest cricket teams in the history of the game.Related

Succession: What next for India in Tests?

How did India build their world-beating bench strength? They have a system

Could India become mighty like West Indies and Australia of old?

India are the best Test team irrespective of WTC standings

This article looks at only Test cricket, since that’s where India have apparently most recently failed. However, it is difficult to compare Test teams because unlike, say, a formal league (such as the IPL, or the English Premier League in football), Test cricket does not operate on a regular calendar. The Future Tours Programme provides for home and away tours over a four- or five-year cycle. Leaving Afghanistan and Ireland aside for now, since they are just beginning their time as Test teams, the other ten Test teams are supposed to play each other home and away regularly. One way to evaluate teams, which is used in this article, is to consider each team’s most recent home and away series against the other nine teams.Note: For many seasons in the 21st century, Pakistan fulfilled their “home” fixtures in the Test tours calendar in the UAE (several teams, several seasons), in Sri Lanka (2002-03 vs Australia), and in England (2010 vs Aus). These fixtures are counted as home fixtures for Pakistan in this article.This method is not perfect. No method is. But considering that the key virtue of Test cricket is that it tests its contestants under a wide variety of circumstances, looking at the most recent home and away results is among the better ways of evaluating Test teams. There are some obvious problems here, such as India not having played Pakistan in Tests since 2007-08, and India having played Australia twice in Australia in the last five years. In all such cases, the most recent series result is included. Eighteen series are considered for each team – nine at home and nine away.

As things currently stand (see the table above), India have won 32 and lost ten Tests in their most recent home and away series, and won 14 series, lost three and shared one. Along with Australia, they are the best team of this era. Let’s consider the picture at two recent points in Test history when the Indian Test team reached a peak of sorts – at the end of the 2003-04 season, when they split a series in Australia and won in Pakistan (second table), and at the end of the 2010-11 season, when they split a series in South Africa (third table).The striking thing about the 2003-04 chart below is the near parity of the five mid-table teams – England, India, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and Pakistan – far behind South Africa, the second-best team of that cycle, and Australia. It suggests that these teams found it difficult to compete against Australia (South Africa were temporarily in decline by the middle of 2004 – Allan Donald had retired, and Dale Steyn was yet to develop into the maestro he eventually became). These mid-table sides were all able to win about a third of their Tests. Australia, with Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath in their ranks during this period, had a bowling attack that no other side could match. Eventually, England would match them at home in 2005, and win back the Ashes for the first time since 1986-87.

The landscape had shifted by 2010-11 in two respects. First, England, South Africa, India and Sri Lanka had improved. Second, it was an era of relatively shallow attacks and excellent batting wickets. At the end of the 2022-23 season, 173 out of 209 Tests (83%) produced outright results. By the end of the 2010-11 season, 162 out of 221 Tests (73%) had produced outright results. India had the second-best record of all teams by the end of the 2010-11 season, but they won less than half their Tests.

Evidence for the relative shallowness of bowling attacks and batting friendliness of the conditions during the first decade of this century is also seen in the bowling averages by bowling position. Rolling bowling averages by bowling position are shown in the graph below. The bowling position for a bowler in an innings is when the bowler is first asked to bowl in the innings. New-ball bowlers occupy positions one (the bowler who delivers the first over of the innings) and two (the bowler who delivers the second over of the innings). The first-change bowler occupies position three, the second change position four, and so on.Getty ImagesFor much of the 20th century (with a brief exception in the 1960s) at least one, if not both new- ball bowlers in Tests took their wickets at a cost of under 30 runs per wicket on average. Change bowlers have taken their wickets between 30 and 35 runs per wicket, with the exception of the 1950s, when the third and fourth bowlers averaged 29-30 runs per wicket. In the early 2000s change bowlers only managed 34-37 runs per wicket. From 2000 to 2011, Australia played 136 Tests, of which only 21 (15%) were drawn. Of the 411 Tests not involving Australia during this period, 116 (28%) were drawn.In the second decade of this century, and especially in the second half of this decade, with the effects of the DRS, fewer featherbeds, and deeper pace attacks, outright results have become more common. Of the most recent 200 Tests, 28 were drawn. In the 200-Test span ending in the last Test of the 2010-11 season, which ran from March 2006 to January 2011 (no Tests were played from February 2011 to May that year, because of the ODI World Cup), 57 were drawn. The effect of shallower attacks is seen even in matches involving outright results, and not just in the frequency of outright results. In periods with weaker new-ball bowling, the average cost of a wicket for both winning and losing sides rises (see the table below).

The current era has been one of great bowling depth in more Test teams, especially in their home conditions, than ever before. In eras with deeper bowling attacks, more teams can realistically win Test matches. Conditions that make draws unlikely (absent inclement weather for significant periods of the Test) make defeat more likely for both sides. Taking 20 wickets is necessary for winning a Test match (the rare exceptions being declarations that have gone wrong, or the even rarer innings forfeit). In the table above, 198 teams (or 49.5%) managed to bowl the opposition out twice in a Test in the 200 Tests from Test No. 2201 to No. 2400, and 99 (55%) have managed it in Tests since January 2021. Among the many reasons for this improvement is the advent of the DRS, and improved drainage and ground-management technology, which has shortened weather interruptions. In what is arguably one of the less discussed aspects of the contemporary game, ubiquitous access of video analysis, ball-tracking records, and most crucially, superior fitness and workload management for bowlers, have also helped. Since January 2016, four out of ten Test teams have bowled the opposition out twice in at least half their Tests.India have won 64% of the Tests in their most recent cycle, during which time the factors described in the paragraph above have been in play. It is an extraordinary achievement by an extraordinary side. Few teams in the history of Test cricket have competed as well as India have with their fast and slow bowlers alike. In the 34 Tests India have played outside Asia after Test No. 2200 (in 2016), their fast bowlers have taken 372 wickets at 26.8 apiece, while their spinners have managed 174 wickets at 28.6 apiece. In 41 Tests in Asia during the same period, India’s spinners have managed 523 wickets at 22.6 runs per wicket, and their fast bowlers have managed 238 wickets at 24.6 runs per wicket. No other team has achieved this sub-30 record across the board (pace and spin) in conditions that might be considered seam-dominant and conditions that might be considered spin-dominant. England, Australia and South Africa have had more potent pace attacks than India outside Asia during this period, but their spinners have been significantly more expensive (with the exception of Australia, who have Nathan Lyon in their ranks). Similarly, New Zealand and West Indies have had pace attacks comparable to India in Tests outside Asia during this period, but their spinners have also been more expensive. Everywhere India travels, they face excellent attacks.Consider the example of India beating England in England. Technically, they failed to achieve this in 2021, since the fifth Test of that series was postponed, and they lost that postponed match, at Edgbaston in 2022, and the series was squared 2-2. Before then, India beat England in England in 1971, 1986 and 2007. All three were short series. In 1971 and 2007, rain saved them from near certain defeat at least once (arguably twice in 1971). In 1986, England lost at home to both India and New Zealand after being whitewashed by West Indies in the West Indies.Of the three Indian series wins in England, they were luckiest in 1971, against Ray Illingworth’s side, which had just won the Ashes in Australia. In 1986, John Lever (67 wickets), Graham Dilley (50), Richard Ellison (34), Neil Foster (34) and Derek Pringle (16) were England’s most experienced seamers, and Phil Edmonds (91) and John Emburey (89) the most experienced spinners. In 2007, James Anderson (46) and Ryan Sidebottom (16) were England’s most experienced seamers. Chris Tremlett was on debut. Monty Panesar (65) was England’s most experienced spinner. The 2021 and 2022 Tests were different. The English attack included Anderson (617) and Stuart Broad (523), to go with Moeen Ali (181), Ben Stokes (158) and Chris Woakes (112). In addition, they had Ollie Robinson, who has since shown himself to be a world-class Test match fast bowler. The 2021-22 England side were a different proposition compared to the 1971, 1986 and 2007 ones.This great Indian era, however, is coming to an end now. The Indian Test team of 2023 is their oldest ever in Test cricket in terms of average age. The team that faced Australia in the WTC final in June 2023 had an average age of 32.6 years. The sides of 2010-11 (30.6 years), 2003-04 (27.1 years) and 2013-14 (27.6 years) are the other India teams considered in this article. It is an inescapable downside of having a generation of a dozen or so players of similar age who all turned out to be world-class competitors.

Change is in the air. The Indian selectors have signalled as much by leaving out Umesh Yadav (age 35) and Cheteshwar Pujara (35), and resting Mohammed Shami (32), and replacing them with Mukesh Kumar (29), Ruturaj Gaikwad (26) and Yashasvi Jaiswal (21). Four regulars – Shreyas Iyer, KL Rahul, Jasprit Bumrah and Rishabh Pant – remain sidelined with injuries. Ishant Sharma (34) already seems to be out of Test contention for fitness reasons.This is yet another problem of a successful era in which the core of a team is more or less of the same age. If India now look for batting replacements in the 20-24 age group, which is where they have historically found their best batters, it will mean bypassing a couple of cricketing generations of batters (if we take a cricketing generation to be about six years – the time involved in a player moving from Under-15 cricket to the senior level at age 21). Of the 46 players who have batted in the top six for India A in first-class matches since the start of 2016, eight have played for India (discounting the likes of Ajinkya Rahane, Cheteshwar Pujara, KL Rahul and Wriddhiman Saha, who had already made their Test debuts by 2016). Of these, only Shubman Gill, Rishabh Pant, and perhaps Shreyas Iyer, currently command a first-choice spot in the India Test XI. Several of their India A colleagues, like Abhimanyu Easwaran (27), Priyank Panchal (33), Hanuma Vihari (29), Ankit Bawne (30), Ravikumar Samarth (30) and Karun Nair (31), seem to have been leapfrogged now by Jaiswal and Gaikwad (who are also India A alums). Srikar Bharat has been the regular India A wicketkeeper, but despite being a magnificent keeper, he is unlikely to keep his Test spot when the brilliant Pant (India A, 2017-18) returns from his injury. There isn’t an obvious solution to this problem.

What does the future look like? For a glimpse, consider the state of Test cricket at the end of the 2013-14 season (see table above). Having won 12 and lost two series (difference: ten) in their cycle ending with the 2010-11 season, India finished the 2013-14 season having lost six series and won nine – a reversal of seven series (out of 18). Until a new generation, or at least, a new core settles into its place, India will find winning Test matches and series significantly more difficult than they have made it seem in the last few years. India have won 172 and lost 176 in their 570-Test history. Fifty of those 172 Test wins (and only 21 defeats) have come since Virat Kohli took over the Test team from MS Dhoni in December 2014. Of their 286 Tests outside India, 58 have been won and 122 lost. Since Kohli took over from Dhoni, there have been 20 wins and 19 defeats in Tests outside India.We could remember two Test matches in England in June, or we could remember 50 Test wins everywhere in the world in every month of the calendar. The choice is ours. When teams win a lot, winning often appears easy. It is never easy. I know how I will remember this Indian team – as the best team in the world of its time, and as one of the greatest teams in the history of Test cricket.

How many Test cricketers have won medals in the World Athletics Championship?

And how many bowlers have taken hat-tricks as well as been victims of one?

Steven Lynch29-Aug-2023Stuart Broad took a hat-trick in a Test, and was also a victim in one. How many others have been on both sides of a hat-trick? asked Abhishek Chakravorty from India

You’re right that Stuart Broad not only claimed a Test hat-trick – in fact he took two, against India at Trent Bridge in 2011, and Sri Lanka at Headingley in 2014 – but was also part of one, as the last victim of Peter Siddle’s birthday hat-trick in Brisbane in 2010-11.Five other men have featured on both sides of a Test hat-trick: Darren Gough (England), Shane Warne (Australia), Nuwan Zoysa (Sri Lanka), Harbhajan Singh (India) and Rangana Herath (Sri Lanka). For the full list of Test hat-tricks, click here.In men’s ODIs, there are also six: Kapil Dev (India), Mohammad Sami (Pakistan), Brett Lee (Australia), Thisara Perera (Sri Lanka), Rubel Hossain (Bangladesh) and Zimbabwe’s Prosper Utseya, who was actually part of two hat-tricks as well as taking one. For the ODI list, click here.And there are two in men’s T20Is: Khalid Ahmadi of Belgium and Uganda’s Kenneth Waiswa. For that list, click here.There are no instances in women’s Tests or ODIs, but four in T20Is: by Marizanne Kapp (South Africa), Megan Schutt (Australia), Fahima Khatun (Bangladesh) and Onnicha Kamchomphu (Thailand). For that list, click here.Does the famous match at the Wanderers when South Africa scored 438 to win still hold the record for the highest aggregate in a one-day international? asked Abdurrahman Bakhsh from South Africa

On that memorable evening in Johannesburg in March 2006, Australia ran up 434 for 4, but South Africa edged past them with 438 for 9. The match aggregate of 872 runs not only remains the ODI record – next comes the 825 of India (414 for 7) vs Sri Lanka (411 for 8) in Rajkot in 2009-10 – but is still the highest in any List A (senior one-day) match. It came under threat at Trent Bridge in 2016, when the Royal London Cup game between Nottinghamshire (445 for 8) and Northamptonshire (425) featured 870 runs. In all, there have now been 11 List A games with 800 or more runs.Seven different St Lucia bowlers took a wicket in an innings in a CPL match earlier this month. Was this a record for any T20 game? asked Sandesh Acharekar from India

Seven St Lucia Kings bowlers took a wicket in their recent Caribbean Premier League match against Barbados Royals in Gros Islet – Matthew Forde grabbed three, and the six other bowlers one apiece (there was also a run-out, from the first ball of the innings). This equalled the record for senior T20 cricket: there have now been no fewer than 25 instances of seven, including five in official internationals. Earlier this year, seven Ireland bowlers took wickets as they upset Bangladesh in Chattogram.Kumar Sangakkara and Brian Lara are among eight batters to have scored a double-hundred and a hundred in the same Test•Getty ImagesDerbyshire’s Luis Reece scored a double-hundred and a century in the same game earlier this season. How often has this happened? asked Michael Edwards from… Derbyshire

Left-hander Luis Reece made 131 and added 201 not out as Derbyshire followed on against Glamorgan in Derby last month.Reece provided the 73rd instance of this double in first-class cricket, but only the second for Derbyshire, after the Australian Chris Rogers against Surrey at The Oval in 2010. The first to do it anywhere was CB Fry, with 125 and 229 for Sussex against Surrey in Hove in 1900 (the only instance before the First World War). Zaheer Abbas achieved the feat four times, all for Gloucestershire, remaining not out in all eight innings.The figure of 73 includes eight occurrences in Tests, the most recent by Marnus Labuschagne for Australia against West Indies in Perth in 2022-23, and also the two instances of a triple and a single century in the same Test – by Graham Gooch for England vs India at Lord’s in 1990, and Kumar Sangakkara for Sri Lanka vs Bangladesh in Chattogram in 2013-14.Also, in the main number are the two cases of two double-centuries in the same first-class match, by Arthur Fagg for Kent against Essex in Colchester in 1938, and Angelo Perera for Nondescripts vs Sinhalese Sports Club in Colombo in 2018-19.As the World Athletics Championships are going on at the moment, I wondered if any Test cricketers had ever won medals? asked Andrew Simpson from England

By the time the World Athletics Championships began, in 1983, increased professionalism meant it was increasingly difficult for anyone to rise to the top in more than one sport, as had been relatively commonplace in earlier years. But you should never say never: I believe there is one world athletics medallist who also played a cricket Test match. Sunette Viljoen won the silver medal in the women’s javelin in Daegu in 2011, and bronze in Beijing in 2015; in Rio de Janeiro in 2016 she won an Olympic silver medal too. Before her athletics career took over, Viljoen played one Test for South Africa, against India in Paarl in 2001-02. She also played 17 one-day internationals, and featured in the 2000 World Cup. One imagines you wouldn’t have wanted to try a quick single to her in the field.There was another close connection to Test cricket in the most recent world championships. Rai Benjamin won the bronze medal in the men’s 400 metres hurdles, having won silver in the same event in 2019 and 2022; he also won silver (and a gold in the 4x400m relay) at the Tokyo Olympics. He’s the son of the former West Indian fast bowler Winston Benjamin, who played 21 Tests and 85 ODIs between 1986 and 1995.Also in Budapest, Brandon Starc – the brother of Australian fast bowler Mitchell Starc – finished eighth in the men’s high jump.Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

An hour of hell: Deconstructing Pakistan's jaw-dropping collapse

From a solid position, it suddenly and irretrievably all went downhill, triggered by the dismissal of Babar Azam

Shashank Kishore14-Oct-20231:32

‘Lack of application, mindless batting’, says Urooj Mumtaz

It’s possible Babar Azam has never batted in as humdrum an atmosphere as what existed at the Narendra Modi Stadium while he was around, making India work. When you are box-office royalty, even a simple hand wave can fire the decibel levels. So what are the chances that a pristine cover drive elicits nothing more than pin-drop silence? It just seems wrong, right?When Babar bats, even the most objective person cannot help the odd clap or loud thump. It’s simply a natural reaction to witnessing a thing of beauty. And Babar’s shots are this most times. The kind of shots you pay big money to watch. And people who flocked into Motera on Saturday invested big, of course.Whether it was the time taken to cover train journeys from the far east or down south, or spending a night in pitched tents at designated spots on the outskirts in neighbouring Nadiad. People had traded months of savings and plenty of energy just to be able to witness the occasion.And then they saw Babar bat. There was disdain and dominance in the way he simply met the ball right under his eyes and caressed it with minimal feet. It’s the kind of batsmanship that has wings to transport you into a parallel universe. Like the on-drive he welcomed Shardul Thakur with first ball. Ufff. High elbow, straight bat, an element of wrist, a lovely followthrough. Magic.Babar was simply loading up and the stunned silence in the crowd told you quite clearly that India had a task at hand. But Rohit Sharma and Co weren’t perhaps as stressed as the crowd was; they knew their bowling had all-round awesomeness. And all it took was one awe-inspiring spell to kill off the contest. Even batters as seasoned as Babar and Mohammad Rizwan, coming off a seminal knock in the previous game, weren’t immune to it.Related

ICC chair Barclay on Arthur remark: 'Will review all criticisms'

India's bowling unit: Gods of small things

Pakistan’s tactic seemed clear. Build an innings, go deep and then tee off. Babar was largely copybook in his pursuit, Rizwan a bit more enterprising. One of his first acts was one of daredevilry – you simply don’t sweep Ravindra Jadeja against the turn, at least not that early.ESPNcricinfo’s Karthik Krishnaswamy posed this question to Jadeja after the Australia game, asking whether he lines up a batter based on the surface and how he decides the amount of turn he wants to impart to a delivery. Jadeja jokingly dismissed it, not wanting to give away much for the risk of his plans being “printed in English” for the world to read. It’s now a popular Instagram reel beneath which there’s sound logic for anyone wanting to decode it.Rizwan completely shunned the sweep against the turn from deliveries starting on middle from there on. It was a direct acknowledgment of Jadeja’s skills. As Jadeja went about tying knots at one end, Kuldeep Yadav was strengthening this position at the other. Pakistan’s first reaction was to try and keep him out, limiting their range of shots. Kuldeep strung together 17 dots in five overs and even nearly had Babar lbw. The pressure to break free was beginning to show.The stranglehold wasn’t lost on Rohit. He duly went back to Mohammed Siraj in the hope of a wicket in the 28th over and succeeded two overs later when Siraj had Babar. He was no more than a split-second late on a ball he wanted to glide but was defeated by the skid. You wondered if all that risk was worth one run, but then it’s also a shot he profits a lot from.It’s a pressure-relieving shot that Babar plays with great finesse; when he reels off boundaries through them, it seems all too cute and mushy. So far this tournament, Babar hadn’t lasted long enough for teams to apply this kind of squeeze. Now that India had done it, it was the first time he’d been tested in a real sense. And he didn’t quite get his release shot right in the first instance. This then was the inch of an opening that India would go on to open up into an acre.Saud Shakeel could’ve been out second ball had Siraj effected a direct hit at the bowler’s end, but he couldn’t cash in on the luck. If it was skid that did Babar in, decisiveness cost Saud as he played back to one that drifted in. It was a costly mistake against Kuldeep, who is a confidence bowler.1:27

‘Lack of application, mindless batting’, says Urooj Mumtaz

When he’s in rhythm, there’s an unmistakable confidence to his wrong ‘uns. Some wristspinners use it as a stock ball, Kuldeep doesn’t, but cleverly varies his line of attack. Iftikhar Ahmed expected the ball to spin in, and because it started from outside leg, he backed himself to go through with the slog sweep even though he didn’t get to the pitch of it. This one went the other way and snuck through to crash into the stumps. At that point, Pakistan had lost 3 for 11 in 3.3 overs.This is Kuldeep 2.0, but even in his previous avatar, he’d been gobbling up Pakistan’s batters with his thrift and guile. Remember that ball to Babar from the 2019 World Cup? The ball that had Shane Warne guffawing in awe?Okay, why go that far? Let’s look back just six weeks prior, to Colombo, where he bamboozled Pakistan with a five-for at the Asia Cup. So, there’s a history of struggle against Kuldeep. Here, in a World Cup game, a combination of mental cobwebs from the past and a bowler at his peak contributed to the collapse. It’s the kind of scenario that leave captains wanting to attack from both ends and Rohit certainly wasn’t in the mood to let it slip.With Jasprit Bumrah back on, the alarm bells began to ring. Pakistan don’t play India a lot, and there’s only so much you can analyse. All told, Bumrah can bowl deliveries that can be hard to analyse. Sure, he does wicked angles, bowls mean bouncers, floors batters with pinpoint yorkers. But how can data and match-ups prepare you for his most underrated delivery – or is it underrated anymore? An offcutter that landed on a perfect length deviated just about enough to beat Rizwan’s push. To outdo a batter with Rizwan’s form, after he was well set, told you of Bumrah’s clutch mentality. And yet it wasn’t even his best ball.

‘All told, 8 for 36 in 80 balls and little over an hour – it’s what nightmares are made of’

That was reserved for Shadab Khan, who was befuddled by late seam movement that squared him up and kissed the top of off. They’re deliveries you dream of as a fast bowler. This was no dream though; it was unfolding in reality. Pakistan’s innings had just gone from being one full of hope half an hour earlier to a collapse of epic proportions. The heart of their innings had just been ripped out in broad daylight.And just like that, the soft underbelly of their middle order, which had been papered over by individual brilliance on other nights, stood exposed. Rizwan had done the papering over three nights ago. Tonight’s collapse left you wondering what would’ve been had Rizwan retired out with cramps back then. But now they were back to square one. Big top, weak middle.For much of their innings, Pakistan had been walking a tightrope anyway, and that one passage of play from Kuldeep and Bumrah was the nightmare from hell that had the potential to undo everything they’d built up so far at this World Cup. Two wins, including a record chase, the emergence of young stars in Saud and Shafique, the return to form of Babar, and the Rizwan magic. All told, 8 for 36 in 80 balls in little over an hour – it’s what nightmares are made of.It all suddenly felt a little foggy for Pakistan. And the humdrum quiet was gone from the Motera.

Is David Warner the oldest man to score a World Cup century?

And whose record of most World Cup centuries did Rohit Sharma beat?

Steven Lynch24-Oct-2023Was David Warner’s 163 against Pakistan the highest score for Australia in a World Cup? asked Zack Kellogg from Australia

David Warner’s rampaging 163 against Pakistan in the group game in Bengaluru last week puts him third on the Australian list – but since he occupies the top two places as well, he is their men’s record-holder!Warner clattered 178 against Afghanistan in Perth in 2015, and 166 against Bangladesh at Trent Bridge in 2019. The next-highest for Australia as I write is Matthew Hayden’s 158 against West Indies in Antigua in 2007.There is a higher score for Australia in the women’s World Cup, though. Belinda Clark hit 229 not out against Denmark in Mumbai in December 1997. Alyssa Healy hammered 170 in the final against England in Christchurch in April 2022.Who scored the first century in a World Cup, and who took the first five-for? asked Ken Wallace from Australia

You probably didn’t mean this, but since the first women’s World Cup predated the men’s by two years – it was held in England in 1973 – the first World Cup century was actually scored by England’s Lynne Thomas, against an International XI in Hove. Thomas was eventually run out for 134 after an opening stand of 246 with Enid Bakewell, who finished with 101 not out. Bakewell made another century later in that inaugural competition, as did Rachael Heyhoe Flint. The first five-for was by the Australian seamer Tina Macpherson, who had figures of 12-7-14-5 as Young England were skittled for 57 in Bournemouth, a few hours before New Zealand slow left-armer Glenys Page took 6 for 20 against Trinidad & Tobago in St Albans.Turning to the men, identifying the first century isn’t quite as straightforward as it might sound. The first men’s World Cup began with four matches on the same day – June 7, 1975 – all starting at 11am. Dennis Amiss scored 137 for England against India at Lord’s in one of the opening games, while New Zealand’s Glenn Turner tucked in for an unbeaten 171 against East Africa at Edgbaston in another. They still stopped for lunch in ODIs in those days, and when the players trooped off at 1pm Amiss had 98 (after 35 overs of the eventual 60) and Turner 82 (after 40). We don’t have precise ball-by-ball details, but Amiss got to three figures first – just. He reached 100 in the 37th over, and was out in the 51st.The first men’s five-wicket haul is easier to pin down: also on that opening day in 1975, Dennis Lillee took 5 for 34 for Australia against Pakistan in their group game at Headingley. The only other five-fors in that tournament were by Lillee’s team-mate Gary Gilmour, who collected 6 for 14 as England were bundled out for 93 in the semi-final at Headingley, and 5 for 48 in the final against West Indies at Lord’s.Sachin Tendulkar has six centuries from 44 World Cup innings•Getty ImagesIt’s David Warner’s 37th birthday this week. Was he the oldest man to score a century in a World Cup match? asked Tess McKenzie from Australia

Warner is due to turn 37 on Friday (October 27), and a week before that hit 163 against Pakistan in Bengaluru.Six men older than Warner have scored centuries in the World Cup. Leading the way is Sri Lanka’s Tillakaratne Dilshan, who was 38 years 148 days old when he made 104 against Scotland in Hobart in March 2015. Sunil Gavaskar was 35 days younger when he scored 103 not out – his only ODI century – for India against New Zealand in Nagpur in October 1987.Sachin Tendulkar (2011) and the distinguished Sri Lankan trio of Sanath Jayasuriya (in 2007), Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara (both 2015) were all 37 when they made their last World Cup hundreds.New Zealand’s Barb Bevege was 39 when she scored 101 against the International XI in Auckland during the 1982 women’s World Cup, while England’s Jan Brittin was 38 when she made 138 against Pakistan in Vijayawada during the 1997 tournament. For the women’s World Cup list, click here.Is it right that Rohit Sharma now has the most World Cup centuries? Whose record did he beat? asked Matthew Mitchell from New Zealand

It is right, yes. Rohit Sharma’s 84-ball 131 against Afghanistan in Delhi was his seventh century in World Cup matches, which included one in 2015 and a record five in England in 2019.The previous record of six was held by Sachin Tendulkar; next with five come Ricky Ponting and David Warner of Australia and Kumar Sangakkara of Sri Lanka. Rohit’s seventh century came in his 19th World Cup innings: Tendulkar finished with six from 44.Six Multan players scored centuries in a first-class innings the other day. Was this a record? asked Zahoor Afzal Khan from Pakistan

The match you’re talking about was in the Quaid-e-Azam Trophy, Pakistan’s domestic first-class competition, in Lahore last week. After their side was put in, six Multan batters scored between 101 and 118. Captain Zain Abbas (118) and wicketkeeper Haseebullah Khan (101) started with an opening stand of 204, then Sharoon Siraj made 114 and Mohammad Basit Ali 105, before Saim Ayyaz (117) and Ali Usman (105 not out) put on 186 for the seventh wicket. Zahid Mahmood, the legspinner who played two Tests against England last December, might be irritated at bagging a duck on a pretty friendly pitch at the Gaddafi Stadium: after Multan declared at 718 for 8, Lahore Blues made 578 for 6 before a draw was agreed. Imran Butt scored 255 and his fellow opener Hashim Ibraheem 120 for them.There had been only one previous first-class innings that contained six individual centuries. In a Ranji Trophy semi-final in Indore in 1945-46, Holkar ran up the little matter of 912 for 8 declared: their six centurions included the 50-year-old CK Nayudu, whose first-class career still had 17 years to run.There have been four cases of five centuries in an innings, one just a couple of weeks before on the same ground in Lahore, when Karachi Whites reached 784 for 5 against Lahore Whites, with Sarfaraz Ahmed making 200 not out. The others were by New South Wales (918) against South Australia in Sydney in 1900-01, and two in Tests, by Australia (758 for 8 declared) against West Indies in Kingston in 1955, and Pakistan (546 for 3 declared) against Bangladesh in Multan in 2001-02.And there’s an update to last week’s question about players who have bagged a golden duck but took a wicket with their first delivery in the same World Cup match, from the Melbourne statistician Charles Davis

“There’s one other case in a World Cup: Phil DeFreitas did it against New Zealand in Wellington in March 1992. In the opening match of the same World Cup, Australia’s Craig McDermott took a wicket with his first legal ball and was run out for one after facing one delivery, against New Zealand in Auckland. He was not run out first ball though.”Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

Five PSL stars who could be on their way to the T20 World Cup

They may or may not make the squad to the USA and the Caribbean, but have done enough to get on the selectors’ radar

Danyal Rasool20-Mar-2024Haider AliThere is no evidence that Haider Ali has changed, but he merely served a reminder of what he is like at his best, a seductively clean ball-striker. Having seemingly regressed after a string of low scores over the past couple of years, he was left unpicked at the draft before Islamabad United plumped for him as a late replacement. And two nerveless, unbeaten innings in virtual knockouts for United conjured flashbacks of the kind of player Pakistan thought they were getting with Haider.Earlier in Haider’s career, Pakistan tried to use him up the order, but with a paucity of lower-order hitters at United, he was deployed there, and that now offers possibilities for Pakistan. Competition for places is much less fierce in those lower-middle-order positions, and the upcoming T20Is against New Zealand will be the perfect time for a trial.There’s no reason 23-year-old Haider cannot improve, but if Pakistan think he has turned a corner, they may be disappointed. He failed to reach double-figures in 12 of his last 19 innings, so a clarity of thought around the purpose of Haider will be essential. In him, a side acquires an occasional big-hitter, not a guaranteed run-scorer.Imad Wasim might not be done with international cricket yet•PCBImad WasimImad Wasim last played for Pakistan over a year ago, and has officially retired from international cricket, but it’s difficult to ignore him. A player who effortlessly polarises opinion, Imad’s consistently effective all-round showings this tournament were a throwback to a time when he opened the bowling for a side that won 11 T20I series in a row. Injuries, and a perceived lack of commitment to fitness, have seen his international career fade, but with the bulk of this year’s T20 World Cup in the Caribbean, the case for one last dance with the international side has only become stronger.His economy rate of 6.60 was matchless – no bowler (minimum 25 overs) came within almost a full run of it – and his ability to nibble away at opposition top orders without being a run-leaker is far too alluring a combination to ignore. Add to that his record in the CPL, where his 61 wickets have come at under 19, and an economy rate second only to Sunil Narine’s in the history of that competition, and he begins to look like a shoo-in.And that’s without talking about his batting. While not a power-hitter by any stretch of the imagination, Imad’s contributions lower down the order kept Islamabad alive through the group stages, and his presence at the death in the final held the tail together.An unretirement then?The mystery with Mehran Mumtaz is how exactly he gets the ball to grip and turn while bowling at near 100kph•PCBMehran MumtazThere are mystery spinners who appear gimmicky, and mystery spinners who offer a function. The mystery with Mehran Mumtaz is how exactly he gets the ball to grip and turn while bowling at near 100kph. Mumtaz, the 20-year-old left-arm bowler, didn’t play much of the PSL, but in the five games he did, he was both captivating and effective. He took five wickets, but it was the economy rate that stood out – 6.63, a smidge over Imad’s.Five games might not be a significant sample size, but if there are questions over Imad’s longevity and fitness, there should be no similar concerns for Mumtaz. He bowls the bulk of his balls in powerplays, and provided significant breakthroughs in all but one game, counting Reeza Hendricks, Shadab Khan and Saud Shakeel among his victims. He remains an unknown quantity to most in Pakistan, but Pakistan have 12 games before the T20I World Cup, and an ideal opportunity to test him.Abrar Ahmed isn’t a red-ball specialist, and proved that again at the PSL this year•Getty ImagesAbrar AhmedThis, perhaps, is the safer and more likely play for Pakistan’s selectors. Abrar Ahmed broke through at the PSL with Karachi Kings and Peshawar Zalmi before injuries wiped years off his career. But when he re-emerged, Pakistan, for some reason, viewed him as a red-ball specialist, handing him his international debut against England in Multan. He made an instant impression, taking five wickets before lunch and since, the six matches he’s played have all come in the Test format.He was viewed as Pakistan’s frontline spinner for the tour of Australia before a pinched nerve in his right leg ruled him out, but at the PSL this year, he demonstrated his T20 nous has not quite deserted him. He was the third-highest wicket-taker of the tournament, taking a wicket every 15 deliveries at an economy rate superior to Usama Mir’s or Mohammad Ali’s, the only bowlers more prolific. He was an invaluable part of the Quetta Gladiators side, bowling his full quota in all ten games. If he can remain injury free over the upcoming swing leading to the World Cup, expect to see him in a green shirt with white ball in hand at some point. Perhaps even in the Caribbean.At the PSL, only Babar Azam scored more runs than Usman Khan, and the latter played four fewer games•PCB/PSLUsman KhanYeah, yeah, we know this is a bit of a cheat. He’s not even a Pakistan player, having changed his affiliation to the UAE in 2022. That he’s good enough isn’t a doubt at the moment – at the PSL, only Babar Azam scored more runs and Usman played four fewer games, scoring two of the PSL’s four hundreds at an average in excess of 107 and a strike rate exceeding 164.But he’s still got 14 months left to qualify for the UAE, and though he was lukewarm about his ambitions to play for Pakistan, there is little doubt Pakistan wouldn’t want to let a player like him slip away quite so easily. It all comes too quickly for this year’s World Cup, but Usman in a Pakistan shirt? Don’t rule it out just yet.

India's battle is with themselves

They’re 0-1 down and their batting line-up has been ripped of its usual experience

Alagappan Muthu30-Jan-2024Rahul Dravid is at first slip. Waiting.It’s been 27 overs since the last wicket fell. The crowd might have been anxious, except most of them had chosen to skip the Eden Gardens and head over to the university ground in Jadhavpur.Sourav Ganguly was playing a Ranji Trophy game there.West Indies have just gone past 400 with Darren Bravo doing such a fine impression of his idol Brian Lara that at this very minute they were both on the same exact score after 12 games.It’s Kolkata. It’s a follow-on innings. It’s tantalising.Dravid is at slip. No longer waiting. He moves to his right, smoother than any one-liner I could think of to include here, and he takes the catch.Bravo is gone for 136. West Indies collapse. Fun’s over.This is November 2011, the last time India had to indulge in a home Test with neither Virat Kohli nor Ravindra Jadeja. They really are up against it this time.Only two of the top six have even 20 matches’ worth of experience under their belt and they have to go out onto what is likely to be another spin-friendly pitch and find some way to score enough runs that even England are unable to catch up.

****

Ben Stokes doesn’t miss a lot of things but he seems to have this time. Shubman Gill is at the crease and there is no short midwicket. Joe Root had to step in and remind his captain that a key part of their plan was missing.Touch players can find it difficult on pitches that aren’t true in terms of pace and bounce. They’ll hit these amazing shots only for the ball to end up in the hands of a fielder, often in an orthodox position. They are easily contained. The events in Hyderabad proved this.Related

  • After the big call, 'prepared' Patidar and 'patient' Sarfaraz wait for the big cap

  • Patidar vs Sarfaraz takes centre stage at India nets

  • Jadeja and Rahul ruled out of second Test against England

  • India's No.4 conundrum, the Siraj question, and more

  • How England cracked the risk-reward equation in Hyderabad

Where someone like KL Rahul, who is meticulous with his footwork – moving forward, back and even sideways – and his wristwork was able to find the gaps and keep the scoreboard ticking, Gill was just plonking his front leg out and then reaching out even further to play with bat in front of pad. That’s a classic sign of a batter defending with hard hands.”He has to maybe play a little softer,” Sanjay Manjrekar said in a new video series on ESPNcricinfo called Zoomed In. “Just get a feel of maybe playing the spinners and when getting onto the front foot, maybe look for ones and twos and of course a back-foot play that he has to incorporate.”Gill had asked to be India’s No. 3, taking over from a man who used to demand bowlers to send down the very best that they had if they wanted to tear him away from the crease, but is yet to display the kind of competence required for the role. Ten of his last 11 innings have tallied less than 35 runs. Former India captain and coach Anil Kumble has questioned the team management over the handling of Gill, telling the host broadcaster that “he has been given the cushion perhaps even a Cheteshwar Pujara didn’t get.”

****

Shreyas Iyer gave his wicket away to Jack Leach in India’s chase in Hyderabad•BCCIShreyas Iyer is another long-term investment that is causing India some short-term discomfort. Since the innings that made him – a rough-and-tumble 87 on a Mirpur dustbowl in December 2022 – he averages 14.55 with a highest score of 35. Spin-hitting is his USP and yet when it mattered most – on that last day in Hyderabad – he practically gift-wrapped his wicket to the injured Jack Leach. Tame forward defensives aren’t why he is in this line-up. Had he shown better enterprise, India might have been able to capitalise when the ball got softer and therefore easier to deal with. Instead, he did the one thing a spin-hitter shouldn’t do. He followed the turn and got caught at slip. India would much rather if Iyer gets out the way he did in the first innings, looking to smash the ball for six.

****

Rajat Patidar has made a fifty-plus score in first-class cricket roughly once every three innings. He made one in 2022 that helped Madhya Pradesh win their first-ever Ranji Trophy title. He made one earlier this month, against the England Lions which convinced the Indian team that he was the man to step in when Kohli had to step out for personal reasons.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe challenge for all of these run-machines coming up the ranks in domestic cricket isn’t always whether they are capable – because they are – but it is whether they are clear-headed enough in the heat of battle to make decisions that can change the course of a Test match. Even with close to the strongest XI they had, India came undone on Sunday as soon as the loss became a real possibility.The batters were unwilling to take any risks to throw an unfancied England spin attack off their lengths, which allowed them to settle into their work, build consistency and create wicket-taking opportunities. When people who have been with the set-up were unable to rise to the occasion, imagine how hard it will be for someone from the outside? Someone who may never have another chance like this to prove themselves. India, after all, only have room for five – check that, it’s three – batters in their XI because Kohli and Rohit Sharma are already locked in. This is why Sarfaraz Khan – on top of accumulating mountains of runs, including a 160-ball 161 against the Lions last week – needed other things to fall the way they have to finally be called up to the Test side.There should be a picture of Rohit playing the reverse sweep stuck up on the home dressing room in Visakhapatnam. He was the only batter willing to try something different in order to change the tide of a match that was going away from India. His plate has just got even fuller now. Not only does he have to figure out how to stop England from Bazballing, he’ll have to compensate for a team whose heart, liver and kidneys have been ripped out due to circumstances beyond anyone’s control.India’s handling of the talent they have available to them has recently hit the headlines for the wrong reasons but all through this tour both Rohit and Dravid have been vocal in their support for the people they’ve brought on board. They won’t see the fact that they’re going into a match that they almost have to win with a side short on experience as a downside. They can’t. The whole reason they’ve been developing their bench strength is to ensure that even in times of emergency, they have good options to turn to. Patidar, Sarfaraz, Saurabh Kumar and Washington Sundar have all shown what they’re capable of. They just have to do it again with more on the line than they’re perhaps used to.

Is this the next batch of Australia's golden generation?

Some are around the state first-team or BBL systems already and have shown plenty of promise

Andrew McGlashan12-Feb-20241:47

Australia Under 19 captain Hugh Weibgen: ‘We try to emulate the senior team’

Before Sunday, the last player to captain Australia to the Under-19 World Cup was Mitchell Marsh in 2010. He has just won the Allan Border Medal and will highly likely lead the senior team at this year’s T20 World Cup. Josh Hazlewood was Player of the Match in the final, Kane Richardson was also in the side and Adam Zampa part of the squad.Two years later, when they lost to India in the final the team included Travis Head along with Ashton Turner and Cameron Bancroft. From the 2018 side, also beaten by India in the final, Will Sutherland and Xavier Bartlett have recently made international debuts and Nathan McSweeney is highly tipped to follow. From the 2020 group, Todd Murphy, Tanveer Sangha and Jake Fraser-McGurk are already capped by Australia.There have been others, too, who have gained a handful of matches at the top level and many others who have played, and continue to do so, professionally at domestic level. However, it is not a straight line from being an Under-19 international to then forging a full career.Related

  • Peake picked for Australia A after one first-class game

  • Beardman: 'Our strong suit has been how close we are as a group'

  • Red-hot Australia defend 253 to win fourth Under-19 World Cup

It’s hard to say where all the current Australia U-19 side, victorious over India by 79 runs in Benoni, will be in 10 or 12 years’ time, but there is a feeling it could be something of a golden generation in terms of those who do kick on with their cricket careers.A number are already around the state first-team or BBL systems: Sam Konstas has made his Sheffield Shield debut for New South Wales, Player of the Final Mahli Beardman (who is highly regarded by Marsh) has appeared in one-day cricket for Western Australia, Harry Dixon has a BBL contract with Melbourne Renegades as does exciting quick Callum Vidler with Brisbane Heat and captain Hugh Weibgen holds a rookie Queensland contract.”If they can all keep working hard on their games there’s plenty who can make a career out of the game,” Australia Under-19 coach Anthony Clark told ESPNcricinfo the morning after the final. “Where they go and how far will depend on how hard they work, but the raw ability is certainly there for a lot of them.”My message after the game was obviously congratulations and enjoy the win, but the most important thing for all your guys now is when you go back and the next game you play is as important as this one and you need to keep getting better.”Dixon finished as the team’s leading run-scorer with 309 at 44.14 and believed his time with Renegades played a key role. Though he didn’t play, just being able to practice in that environment was priceless.The fast-bowling cartel – Mahli Beardman, Callum Vidler, Charlie Anderson and Tom Straker•ICC/Getty Images”Think it definitely helped with all the coaches they had around there and all the players, taking stuff from them, the likes of Aaron Finch, just soaking up as much as possible,” he said. “With the training there’s a lot of fielding stuff which is mostly what helped me develop a bit more which I think has helped the team.”However, while some already have their foot in the professional door, for others there are more mundane things awaiting when they get home. Oliver Peake, an injury replacement in the squad who made a vital 46 off 43 balls in the final, will be back at school in a few days.”He’s sucked the marrow out of cricket tournaments over the summer break,” his father, Clinton, told . “But he’ll need to go to school and get ready for assessment tasks and normal world stuff.”But a cricket career looks to be in the offing. “He’s bit of a student of the game, loves batting and is just a really good kid,” Clark said. “As someone so young, the future looks bright for him.”It was Australia’s pace attack that took most of the headlines with Beardman’s 3 for 15 in the final following Tom Straker’s 6 for 24 against Pakistan while Vidler, 14 wickets at 11.71, caught the eye with his pace regularly above 140kph.”With the bowling attack we have it’s pretty much a luxury,” Dixon said. “With all the boys being so good we don’t need to get as many on the board. We backed our bowlers in and they were fantastic throughout the whole tournament so credit to them.”The quicks were supplemented by offspinner Raf MacMillan who took 3 for 43 in the final. “He was really important,” Clark said. “Almost the final cog in the wheel and has gone a bit unheralded just because the other four boys are really exciting to watch…he’s very good at what he does.”You never know when you go into a tournament how it’s going to pan out but though we had most bases covered from a skills point of view across out 15. We had seven really good batters, couple of wicketkeepers, couple of spinners with real talent and the five fast bowlers. But you don’t know how it all gels together until it starts happening but really came together nicely as we went through the tournament.”The time the group spent together over the past year has been cited as a key reason behind their success. “They play hard for each other and really care about each other,” Clark said. “When it’s like that it comes together nicely on the field. Obviously, the talent part is the major ingredient but the other stuff is really helpful, too.”The nature of Under-19 cricket means this team won’t play together again, but the class of 2024 will always be World Cup winners. “It’s a massive achievement,” Dixon said. “Just really nice to make some lifelong friends.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus